Will COP29 deliver on the Global South’s demands?

Will COP29 deliver on the Global South’s demands?

Will COP29 deliver on the Global South’s demands?
COP29 gets underway in Baku on Nov. 11. (Reuters)
Short Url

With the dust having long ago settled on COP28, the 28th Conference of the Parties to the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change, held in Dubai, the world now turns its attention to COP29 in Baku, Azerbaijan.

Scheduled for Nov. 11 to 22, COP29 represents a pivotal moment in the world’s climate negotiations, particularly for the Global South.

Developing nations are poised to continue their fight for substantial climate finance, robust adaptation strategies, and equitable policy outcomes within the framework of common but differentiated responsibilities based on the respective capabilities of nations.

COP29 could mark a critical juncture, determining whether these nations will finally gain meaningful influence in shaping global climate action.

COP28 saw intense debates about fossil fuel reduction and climate finance. The event brought together more than 85,000 participants to advance the implementation of the Paris Agreement’s core goals.

These include working to limit the rise in global average temperature to well below 2 degrees Celsius above pre-industrial levels, with a strong focus on pursuing the 1.5 C target. This is in addition to achieving net-zero emissions by mid-century, building climate resilience, and aligning financial flows to support these objectives.

Without tangible progress on climate finance, the promises of the Paris Agreement will remain out of reach for many developing nations.

Hamad S. Alshehab & Hassan M. Alzain

A major milestone at COP28 was the conclusion of the first Global Stocktake, a comprehensive assessment of collective progress toward the Paris Agreement’s goals. The findings reaffirmed the urgent need to ramp up efforts to achieve the long-term climate objectives.

This reaffirmation is especially critical for the Global South, where countries disproportionately affected by rising temperatures often lack the resources to adapt.

The Global Stocktake highlighted areas requiring immediate attention, including increased investment in clean-energy technologies, enhanced land management, and solutions for hard-to-abate sectors.

For developing nations, the success of this process hinges on the mobilization of financial and technical resources to implement these recommendations. Without substantial financing, the Global South remains vulnerable to the impacts of climate change.

Among the most debated aspects of COP28 was the inclusion of fossil fuel phase-out language in the final text.

For the first time, there was an explicit recognition that fossil fuels in energy systems must be phased out to achieve net zero by 2050. This transition should be carried out in a just, orderly, and equitable manner, grounded in scientific evidence.

However, the text’s language remained broad and non-binding, allowing for exceptions including poverty alleviation, which could permit continued fossil fuel use in certain contexts.

For developing nations, this presents both an opportunity and a challenge. Many nations in the Global South are heavily dependent on fossil fuels for socio-economic development and energy access and security.

The transition away from fossil fuels must therefore be accompanied by strong support mechanisms, including technology transfers, and substantial climate finance.

Without these, the phase-out of fossil fuels could exacerbate poverty and hinder socio-economic progress in the Global South​ and, therefore, undermine key expectations of the Paris Agreement.

In 2022, the number of people without access to electricity rose for the first time in more than a decade, reaching 685 million — an increase of 10 million compared to 2021.

This setback indicates we are still off track in achieving the goal of affordable, reliable, sustainable, and modern energy for all by 2030, as noted in the 2024 Tracking SDG 7 Report.

COP28 also saw progress on the Global Goal on Adaptation, with an agreement to double adaptation finance by 2025 when compared to 2019 levels, as outlined in the Glasgow Climate Pact at COP26.

This commitment is vital for the developing nations bearing the brunt of climate change. However, the framework remains vague, with no clear roadmap to monitor or evaluate these commitments.

Adaptation finance often refers to financial resources allocated to help developing countries adapt to the negative impacts of climate change. This is primarily through funding projects and programs designed to build resilience against climate-related disasters.

Adaptation finance is one of the most pressing issues for the Global South. Countries including Bangladesh, Mozambique and the Philippines are already experiencing severe climate impacts.

Without significant financial resources, their ability to adapt is severely limited. COP29 must tackle this gap by ensuring that the promised adaptation finance is fully delivered and effectively addresses the real needs of developing nations.

With COP29 just days away, several key issues will dominate its agenda for developing countries. These include climate finance, the operationalization of the Loss and Damage Fund, and the integration of food systems into national climate strategies.

One of the most pressing issues at COP29 will be climate finance. The Global South has long argued that the financial support from developed countries is inadequate. The Adaptation Gap Report 2023 estimates that the financing needed is at $194 to $366 billion per year.

Without tangible progress on climate finance, the promises of the Paris Agreement will remain out of reach for many developing nations ​across key climate change agenda items — especially adaptation.

Another critical issue is the operationalization of the Loss and Damage Fund, formally established at COP28. The fund is designed to compensate developing countries for existing climate impacts caused by emissions from wealthier nations.

At COP28, pledges to the Loss and Damage Fund quickly reached around $770.6 million. However, this is a drop in the ocean considering the billions of dollars needed to effectively address the scale of losses and damage.

The challenge at COP29 will be to ensure that developed countries follow through with their commitments and that the funds are distributed equitably to those most affected by climate change.

However, key questions remain about the fund’s operational details, including how much funding will be allocated, who will contribute, and how the funds will be distributed.

At COP29, developing nations will call for the rapid implementation of this fund, demanding clear guidelines on eligibility and distribution. They will also advocate for contributions from possible sources within the framework of the Paris Agreement, as the scale of the challenge far exceeds the current level of pledged resources​.

Food systems were also discussed during COP28, but concrete actions were limited.

The agricultural sector is both a significant contributor to climate change and highly vulnerable to its impacts. Developing nations rely heavily on agriculture and, therefore, without integrating food systems into policies, efforts to mitigate climate change will fall short.

The World Bank estimates that by 2050, the global population will reach 10 billion, requiring a 60 percent increase in food production.

At COP29, the Global South will likely urge greater focus on food systems, emphasizing the need for climate-smart agriculture, reduced methane emissions, and more sustainable land-use practices.

To ensure developing countries can effectively make these transitions, strategies must be backed by financial and technical support.

As COP29 approaches, the question remains: Will the voices of the Global South on advanced and concrete socio-economic progress finally be heard?

For years, developing nations have been calling for more ambitious action on climate finance, adaptation, and mitigation. COP29 offers a unique opportunity to address these longstanding issues and ensure that the global climate response is effective.

The success of COP29 will hinge on the willingness of developed countries to fulfill their obligations, engage in constructive and forward-looking negotiations, and provide essential financial and technical support, including honoring the $100 billion pledge and doubling adaptation finance by 2025.

For the Global South to have a fair chance at navigating the climate crisis, COP29 must deliver on its promises and chart a course toward a more inclusive future for all nations, leaving no one behind.

* Hamad S. Alshehab led strategy, finance and governance at Aramco’s Innovation and Product Development Center, LAB7.

* Hassan M. Alzain led the environmental science, sustainability and policy group at Aramco’s Environmental Protection.

Disclaimer: Views expressed by writers in this section are their own and do not necessarily reflect Arab News' point of view

US lawmakers urge Biden to extend TikTok Jan. 19 ban deadline

US lawmakers urge Biden to extend TikTok Jan. 19 ban deadline
Updated 8 min 48 sec ago
Follow

US lawmakers urge Biden to extend TikTok Jan. 19 ban deadline

US lawmakers urge Biden to extend TikTok Jan. 19 ban deadline
  • Biden could extend the deadline by 90 days if he certifies ByteDance is making substantial progress toward a divestiture but it is unlikely ByteDance could meet that standard

WASHINGTON: Two Democratic lawmakers on Monday urged Congress and President Joe Biden to extend a Jan. 19 deadline for China-based ByteDance to sell the US assets of TikTok or face a US ban.
The Supreme Court held arguments Friday on Tiktok and ByteDance’s challenge to the law. A lawyer for the companies, Noel Francisco, said it would be impossible to complete a sale by next week’s deadline.
He said if banned, the short video app used by 170 million Americans would quickly go dark and “essentially the platform shuts down.”
Biden could extend the deadline by 90 days if he certifies ByteDance is making substantial progress toward a divestiture but it is unlikely ByteDance could meet that standard.
Senator Edward Markey said he planned to introduce legislation to delay the deadline by which ByteDance must sell TikTok or face a ban by an additional 270 days.
“A ban would dismantle a one-of-a-kind informational and cultural ecosystem, silencing millions in the process,” Markey said Monday.
“A TikTok ban would impose serious consequences on millions of Americans who depend on the app for social connections and their economic livelihood. We cannot allow that to happen.”
President-elect Donald Trump has asked the court to delay implementation of the law, arguing he should have time after taking office on Jan. 20 to pursue a “political resolution” to the issue.
Representative Ro Khanna, a Democrat, on Monday urged Biden and Trump “to put a pause on this ban so 170 million Americans don’t lose their free speech. Millions of Americans’ livelihood will be ended if this ban takes place.”
If the court does not block the law by Sunday, new downloads of TikTok on Apple or Google app stores would be banned but existing users could continue to access the app for some period. Services would degrade and eventually stop working as companies will be barred from providing support.
The White House did not immediately comment.


China mulls potential sale of TikTok US to Musk, Bloomberg News reports

China mulls potential sale of TikTok US to Musk, Bloomberg News reports
Updated 15 min 13 sec ago
Follow

China mulls potential sale of TikTok US to Musk, Bloomberg News reports

China mulls potential sale of TikTok US to Musk, Bloomberg News reports

Chinese officials are mulling a potential option that involves the sale of TikTok’s US operations to billionaire Elon Musk if the company fails to fend off a potential ban, Bloomberg News reported on Monday, citing people familiar with the matter.
Chinese officials prefer that TikTok remain under the control of parent Bytedance, the report said, adding that the company is contesting the ban with an appeal to the US Supreme Court.
Under one scenario, Musk’s social media platform X would take control of TikTok US and run the business together, the report said, adding that the Chinese officials have yet to reach any firm consensus about how to proceed and their deliberations are still preliminary.
TikTok declined to comment, while Musk did not immediately respond to a request for comment. X could not immediately be reached for a comment.
The Cyberspace Administration of China and China’s Ministry of Commerce, government agencies that could be involved in decisions about TikTok’s future, could not be immediately reached for comment.
Last week, the Supreme Court seemed inclined to uphold a law that would force a sale or ban of the popular short-video app TikTok in the United States by Jan. 19, with the justices focusing on the national security concerns about China that prompted the crackdown.


Trump says he will meet ‘very quickly’ with Putin

Trump says he will meet ‘very quickly’ with Putin
Updated 25 min 46 sec ago
Follow

Trump says he will meet ‘very quickly’ with Putin

Trump says he will meet ‘very quickly’ with Putin
US President-elect Donald Trump said on Monday he is going to meet Russian President Vladimir Putin “very quickly” after he takes office next week.
He did not provide a timeline for the meeting, which would be the first between the leaders of the two countries since Russia’s war with Ukraine started in February 2022.
When asked about his strategy to end the war, Trump told Newsmax: “Well, there’s only one strategy and it’s up to Putin and I can’t imagine he’s too thrilled about the way it’s gone because it hasn’t gone exactly well for him either.
“And I know he wants to meet and I’m going to meet very quickly. I would’ve done it sooner but...you have to get into the office. For some of the things, you do have to be there.”
US Congressman Mike Waltz, the incoming national security adviser, said on Sunday he expected a call between Trump and Putin in “the coming days and weeks.”
Russia’s invasion of Ukraine has left tens of thousands of people dead, displaced millions and triggered the biggest rupture in relations between Moscow and the West since the 1962 Cuban Missile Crisis.

Biden says he’s leaving Trump with a ‘strong hand to play’ in world conflicts

Biden says he’s leaving Trump with a ‘strong hand to play’ in world conflicts
Updated 38 min 54 sec ago
Follow

Biden says he’s leaving Trump with a ‘strong hand to play’ in world conflicts

Biden says he’s leaving Trump with a ‘strong hand to play’ in world conflicts
  • “My administration is leaving the next administration with a very strong hand to play,” Biden said

WASHINGTON: President Joe Biden said Monday that his stewardship of American foreign policy has left the US safer and economically more secure, arguing that President-elect Donald Trump will inherit a nation viewed as stronger and more reliable than it was four years ago.
Biden trumpeted his administration’s work on expanding NATO, rallying allies to provide Ukraine with military aid to fight Russia and bolstering American chip manufacturing to better compete with China during a wide-ranging speech to reflect on his foreign policy legacy a week before ceding the White House to Trump.
Biden’s case for his achievements will be shadowed and shaped, at least in the near term, by the messy counterfactual that American voters once again turned to Trump and his protectionist worldview. And he will leave office at a turbulent moment for the globe, with a series of conflicts raging.
“Thanks to our administration, the United States is winning the worldwide competition compared to four years ago,” Biden said in his address at the State Department. “America is stronger. Our alliances are stronger. Our adversaries and competitors are weaker. We have not gone to war to make these things happen.”
The one-term Democrat took office in the throes of the worst global pandemic in a century, and his plans to repair alliances strained by four years of Trump’s “America First” worldview were quickly stress-tested by international crises: the chaotic US withdrawal from Afghanistan, Russia’s 2022 invasion of Ukraine, and Hamas’ brutal 2023 attack on Israel that triggered the war in the Middle East.
Biden argued that he provided a steady hand when the world needed it most. He was tested by war, calamity and miscalculation.
“My administration is leaving the next administration with a very strong hand to play,” Biden said. “America is once again leading.”
Chaotic US exit from Afghanistan was an early setback for Biden
With the US completing its 2021 withdrawal from Afghanistan, Biden fulfilled a campaign promise to wind down America’s longest war.
But the 20-year conflict ended in disquieting fashion: The US-backed Afghan government collapsed, a grisly bombing killed 13 US troops and 170 others, and thousands of desperate Afghans descended on Kabul’s airport in search of a way out before the final US aircraft departed over the Hindu Kush.
The Afghanistan debacle was a major setback just eight months into Biden’s presidency that he struggled to recover from.
“Ending the war was the right thing to do, and I believe history will reflect that,” Biden said. “Critics said if we ended the war, it would damage our alliances and create threats to our homeland from foreign-directed terrorism out of a safe haven in Afghanistan — neither has occurred.”
Biden’s Republican detractors, including Trump, cast it as a signal moment in a failed presidency.
“I’ll tell you what happened, he was so bad with Afghanistan, it was such a horrible embarrassment, most embarrassing moment in the history of our country,” Trump said in his lone 2024 presidential debate with Biden, just weeks before the Democrat announced he was ending his reelection campaign.
Biden’s legacy in Ukraine may hinge on Trump’s approach going forward
With Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, Biden rallied allies in Europe and beyond to provide Ukraine with billions in military and economic assistance — including more than $100 billion from the US alone. That allowed Kyiv to stay in the fight with Russian President Vladimir Putin’s vastly bigger and better-equipped military.
Biden’s team also coordinated with allies to hit Russia with a steady stream of sanctions aimed at isolating the Kremlin and making Moscow pay an economic price for prosecuting its war.
Biden on Monday marveled that at the start of the war Putin thought Russian forces would easily defeat Ukraine in a matter of days. It was an assessment US and European intelligence officials shared.
Instead, Biden said his administration and its allies have “laid the foundation” for the Trump administration to help Ukraine eventually arrive at a moment where it can negotiate a just end to the nearly three-year old conflict.
“Today, Ukraine is still a free and independent country with the potential for a bright future,” Biden said.
Trump has criticized the cost of the war to US taxpayers and has vowed to bring the conflict to a quick end.
White House national security adviser Jake Sullivan made the case that Trump, a billionaire real estate developer, should consider the backing of Ukraine through the prism of a dealmaker.
“Donald Trump has built his identity around making deals, and the way you make a good deal is with leverage,” Sullivan said in an interview. “Our case publicly and privately to the incoming team is build the leverage, show the staying power, back Ukraine, and it is down that path that lies a good deal.”
Biden’s Mideast diplomacy shadowed by devastation of Gaza
In the Middle East, Biden has stood by Israel as it has worked to root out Hamas from Gaza. That war spawned another in Lebanon, where Israel has mauled Iran’s most powerful ally, Hezbollah, even as Israel has launched successful airstrikes openly inside of Iran for the first time.
The degradation of Hezbollah in turn played a role when Islamist-led rebels last month ousted longtime Syrian leader Bashar Assad, a brutal fixture of Iran’s “Axis of Resistance.”
“Iran is weaker than it’s been in decades,” Biden said.
Biden’s relationship with Israel’s conservative leader Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has been strained by the enormous Palestinian death toll in the fighting — now standing at more than 46,000 dead — and Israel’s blockade of the territory, which has left much of Gaza a hellscape where access to food and basic health care is severely limited.
Pro-Palestinian activists have demanded an arms embargo against Israel, but US policy has largely remained unchanged. The State Department in recent days informed Congress of a planned $8 billion weapons sale to Israel.
Aaron David Miller, a former State Department Middle East negotiator, said the approach has put Iran on its heels, but Biden will pay a reputational cost for the devastation of Gaza.
“The administration was either unable or unwilling to create any sort of restraint that normal humans would regard as significant pressure,” Miller said. “It was beyond Joe Biden’s emotional and political bandwidth to impose the kinds of sustained or significant pressures that might have led to a change in Israeli tactics.”
More than 15 months after the Hamas-led attack that prompted the war, around 98 hostages remain in Gaza. More than a third of those are presumed dead by Israeli authorities.
Biden’s Middle East adviser Brett McGurk is in the Middle East, looking to complete an elusive hostage and ceasefire deal as time runs out in the presidency.
“We are on the brink of a proposal that I laid out in detail months ago finally coming to fruition,” Biden said.
Trump, for his part, is warning that “all hell” will be unleashed on Hamas if the hostages aren’t freed by Inauguration Day.
Sullivan declined to comment on Trump’s threats to Hamas, but offered that the two sides are in agreement about the most important thing: getting a deal done.
“Having alignment of the outgoing and incoming administration that a hostage deal at the earliest possible opportunity is in the American national interest,” he said. “Having unity of message on that is a good thing, and we have closely coordinated with the incoming team to this effect.”

 


Some Israeli soldiers refuse to keep fighting in Gaza

Israeli soldiers are seen at a staging ground near the border with the Gaza Strip, in southern Israel, Tuesday, April 30, 2024.
Israeli soldiers are seen at a staging ground near the border with the Gaza Strip, in southern Israel, Tuesday, April 30, 2024.
Updated 14 January 2025
Follow

Some Israeli soldiers refuse to keep fighting in Gaza

Israeli soldiers are seen at a staging ground near the border with the Gaza Strip, in southern Israel, Tuesday, April 30, 2024.
  • Seven soldiers who’ve refused to continue fighting in Gaza spoke with AP, describing how Palestinians were indiscriminately killed and houses destroyed
  • Ishai Menuchin, spokesperson for Yesh Gvul, a movement for soldiers refusing to serve, said he works with more than 80 soldiers who have refused to fight and that there are hundreds more who feel similarly but remain silent

JERUSALEM: Yotam Vilk says the image of Israeli soldiers killing an unarmed Palestinian teenager in the Gaza Strip is seared in his mind.
An officer in the armored corps, Vilk said the instructions were to shoot any unauthorized person who entered an Israeli-controlled buffer zone in Gaza. He saw at least 12 people killed, he said, but it is the shooting of the teen that he can’t shake.
“He died as part of a bigger story. As part of the policy of staying there and not seeing Palestinians as people,” Vilk, 28, told The Associated Press.
Vilk is among a growing number of Israeli soldiers speaking out against the 15-month conflict and refusing to serve anymore, saying they saw or did things that crossed ethical lines. While the movement is small — some 200 soldiers signed a letter saying they’d stop fighting if the government didn’t secure a ceasefire — soldiers say it’s the tip of the iceberg and they want others to come forward.

Destroyed buildings inside the Gaza Strip are seen from southern Israel, on Tuesday, Jan. 7, 2025. (AP)

Their refusal comes at a time of mounting pressure on Israel and Hamas to wind down the fighting. Ceasefire talks are underway, and both President Joe Biden and President-elect Donald Trump have called for a deal by the Jan. 20 inauguration.
Seven soldiers who’ve refused to continue fighting in Gaza spoke with AP, describing how Palestinians were indiscriminately killed and houses destroyed. Several said they were ordered to burn or demolish homes that posed no threat, and they saw soldiers loot and vandalize residences.
Soldiers are required to steer clear of politics, and they rarely speak out against the army. After Hamas stormed into Israel on Oct. 7, 2023, Israel quickly united behind the war launched against the militant group. Divisions here have grown as the war progresses, but most criticism has focused on the mounting number of soldiers killed and the failure to bring home hostages, not actions in Gaza.

Yuval Green, center, and Yotam Vilk, left, take part in a panel discussion for soldiers refusing to serve in the Gaza Strip, in Tel Aviv, Israel, on Tuesday, Jan. 7, 2025. (AP)

International rights groups have accused Israel of war crimes and genocide in Gaza. The International Court of Justice is investigating genocide allegations filed by South Africa. The International Criminal Court is seeking the arrests of Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and former defense minister Yoav Gallant.
Israel adamantly rejects genocide allegations and says it takes extraordinary measures to minimize civilian harm in Gaza. The army says it never intentionally targets civilians, and investigates and punishes cases of suspected wrongdoing. But rights groups have long said the army does a poor job of investigating itself.
The army told AP it condemns the refusal to serve and takes any call for refusal seriously, with each case examined individually. Soldiers can go to jail for refusing to serve, but none who signed the letter has been detained, according to those who organized the signatures.
Soldiers’ reactions in Gaza.

Yotam Vilk, who served in an armored unit in the Gaza Strip and is now one of a growing number of Israeli soldiers speaking out against the 15-month conflict, poses for a portrait in Tel Aviv, Israel, on Friday, Jan. 10, 2025. (AP)

When Vilk entered Gaza in November 2023, he said, he thought the initial use of force might bring both sides to the table. But as the war dragged on, he said he saw the value of human life disintegrate.
On the day the Palestinian teenager was killed last August, he said, Israeli troops shouted at him to stop and fired warning shots at his feet, but he kept moving. He said others were also killed walking into the buffer zone — the Netzarim Corridor, a road dividing northern and southern Gaza.
Vilk acknowledged it was hard to determine whether people were armed, but said he believes soldiers acted too quickly.

Israeli soldiers stand by a truck packed with bound and blindfolded Palestinian detainees in Gaza, on Dec. 8, 2023. (AP)

In the end, he said, Hamas is to blame for some deaths in the buffer zone — he described one Palestinian detained by his unit who said Hamas paid people $25 to walk into the corridor to gauge the army’s reaction.
Some soldiers told AP it took time to digest what they saw in Gaza. Others said they became so enraged they decided they’d stop serving almost immediately.
Yuval Green, a 27-year-old medic, described abandoning his post last January after spending nearly two months in Gaza, unable to live with what he’d seen.
He said soldiers desecrated homes, using black markers meant for medical emergencies to scribble graffiti, and looted homes, looking for prayer beads to collect as souvenirs.
The final straw, he said, was his commander ordering troops to burn down a house, saying he didn’t want Hamas to be able to use it. Green said he sat in a military vehicle, choking on fumes amid the smell of burning plastic. He found the fire vindictive — he said he saw no reason to take more from Palestinians than they’d already lost. He left his unit before their mission was complete.
Green said that as much as he loathed what he witnessed, “the cruelty was at least in part provoked by the havoc wreaked by Hamas on Oct. 7, which people can forget.”
He said he wants his actions in refusing to serve to help break the vicious cycle of violence on all sides.
The soldiers’ refusal as an act of protest
Soldiers for the Hostages — the group behind the letter troops signed — is trying to garner momentum, holding an event this month in Tel Aviv and gathering more signatures. A panel of soldiers spoke about what they’d seen in Gaza. Organizers distributed poster-size stickers with a Martin Luther King Jr. quote: “One has a moral responsibility to disobey unjust laws.”
Max Kresch, an organizer, said soldiers can use their positions to create change. “We need to use our voice to speak up in the face of injustice, even if that is unpopular,” he said.
But some who fought and lost colleagues call the movement a slap in the face. More than 830 Israeli soldiers have been killed in the war, according to the army.
“They are harming our ability to defend ourselves,” said Gilad Segal, a 42-year-old paratrooper who spent two months in Gaza at the end of 2023. He said everything the army did was necessary, including the flattening of houses used as Hamas hideouts. It’s not a soldier’s place to agree or disagree with the government, he argued.
Ishai Menuchin, spokesperson for Yesh Gvul, a movement for soldiers refusing to serve, said he works with more than 80 soldiers who have refused to fight and that there are hundreds more who feel similarly but remain silent.
Effects on soldiers
Some of the soldiers who spoke to AP said they feel conflicted and regretful, and they’re talking to friends and relatives about what they saw to process it.
Many soldiers suffer from “moral injury,” said Tuly Flint, a trauma therapy specialist who’s counseled hundreds of them during the war. It’s a response when people see or do something that goes against their beliefs, he said, and it can result in a lack of sleep, flashbacks and feelings of unworthiness. Talking about it and trying to spark change can help, Flint said.
One former infantry soldier told AP about his feelings of guilt — he said he saw about 15 buildings burned down unnecessarily during a two-week stint in late 2023. He said that if he could do it all over again, he wouldn’t have fought.
“I didn’t light the match, but I stood guard outside the house. I participated in war crimes,” said the soldier, speaking on condition of anonymity over fears of retaliation. “I’m so sorry for what we’ve done.”